🔗 Share this article

I possess a few opinions regarding that comments delivered by the sports network broadcaster Chris Fowler following Novak Djokovic's victory over the American player during the New York major quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is American – and athletic competitions often encourage patriotic sentiment. Some disappointment was understandable. Rather, Fowler invoked the ongoing absence of American men at grand slam tournaments: not one of them has won a trophy since Andy Roddick in 2003, and he had been the final representative in the competition.

We all enjoy a storyline, me too. But really. Even if the American had beaten Djokovic for the first time, phenomenal talent the Spanish star was looming in the following match, who he has yet to beat in an official match. And had he someway survived that, it would have been title holder the Italian, against whom Fritz had lost 10 of the previous eleven sets. The two young stars had also divided the last seven major titles (and the Spaniard went on to defeat a tired Serbian in the subsequent match). He stated in press following his defeat that he in fact liked his path, because it presented the chance to beat the top three competitors in the sport back-to-back. He is well justified to aspire to the achievement; an competitor is meant to believe in themselves. But entering that Djokovic quarter-final what other person in their right mind had the drought of American champions in mind?

The American star's second serve the sole barrier between her and sustained success

The American, 28, is placed fourth in the global rankings entering this week’s ATP World Tour Finals and has secured his previous six encounters over third-ranked the German with increasing ease. It's likely he could take that spot for himself in the future. But evidently that right now, that’s as far as he can rise: Sinner and Alcaraz sit a vast gap of performance metrics away. Fritz’s elite delivery and concussive strength on each front side and reverse side are sufficiently enough to dispose of most rivals on the professional circuit. When facing the handful of generational talents, though, he is frequently overmatched. The past few years has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nevertheless cover the court with the alarming speed and grace of much shorter players. Fritz is 6ft 5ins and appears that way. His footwork is stiff, as if he hasn't fully adapted to his legs. So he’ll rarely steal a point that the other player was controlling, and playing a soft shot against him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a pretty severe limitation on his upside.

The American has achieved a number of significant, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the decade, he was circling the lower end of the world's best thirty. 24 months after, he was sniffing the top 10. The previous season, he unexpectedly exploded up to fourth place – and held the spot. But the next leap, mixing it up with and defeating all-time-greats like Alcaraz, the Italian, and including a aging Djokovic, is the highest of all. What could the commentator thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing slump of US male players winning major titles when he had departed the US Open in the quarter-finals? The thirst is simply excessive and the appreciation for the difficulty of the challenge too little.

Taylor Fritz made a career-best advancement to the Wimbledon last four in July.

Fritz’s performance in that exact quarter-final should have been enough of an sign. Djokovic triumphed in four sets, a win that only seemed uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a opportunity to hold for 5-5. The duo looked well-balanced during the rallies, with the American earning numerous chances to break. But the champion rescued break point after break point, prolonging the streak to the point of frustration. When he finally did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the middle stanza, he immediately produced a horrendous service game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had lulled him into a battle secondary to the real battle and compelled him to use excessive effort to win it. Down match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve floated to heaven. He extended the match two times on his second serve, but finally committed two errors. It wasn’t a choke, I didn’t think, just a consequence of having to hit an excessive number of weaker deliveries.

The match was quite ironclad proof that the American is insufficiently skilled to defeat any version of the Serbian, who was defeated by Alcaraz in the next round and did not particularly appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly acceptable – Djokovic is the greatest of all time, and may not be at the peak of his athletic abilities now, but has acquired enough knowledge and tactical know-how to make up for a significant portion of the decline. The problem is the individuals who were expecting the American to win, and pressuring him to achieve that, when he was had not accomplished anything that indicated he would.

The American is an valuable contributor to the circuit nonetheless. He’s a patient, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than almost everyone on the men's tour aside from Daniil Medvedev, willing to not just say his emotions or the strategy he felt decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since the last American titlist seems unfair. (Now that Ben Shelton is rubbing shoulders with him in the standings, maybe they can share that burden.)

Year-End Championships: Singles Groups

Jimmy Connors Division

• Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
• The American contender
• Alex de Minaur (Aus)
• The Italian stylist

Swedish icon Division

• The Italian champion
• Alexander Zverev (Ger)
• Ben Shelton (US)
• Félix Auger-Aliassime (Can)

“I’d probably think about it indefinitely if I don’t do it,” the American informed a journalist in June of winning a grand slam. I hope he realizes that he’s not unsuccessful if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming the Spanish and Italian's young, terrifying reign is in fact highly improbable for all other players. {