🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in graves at risk from shoreline retreat argue that indecision on how best to tackle the problem is creating unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Graveyards

The council have identified three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being at risk of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation details a series of options, from doing nothing to disinterring bodies and reburying them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for local people to decide how to move forward.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s happened in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Troubled by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the sea, including its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this romantic idea that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. They won’t. People will take bones as souvenirs and go plundering graves in search of treasures. It’s completely undignified.”

“I fear that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly trouble me to consider this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “To our family it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Clarity

An absence of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Several families want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit funerals to continue for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“It is very emotive,” said one relative. “The official study was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is taken forward. And all parties is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the local diocese. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was ample time to weigh all the choices. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive community discussions to discover the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of the loss of the churches and graveyards was labeled one of “immense sadness for the area,” but church representatives also spoke of a doctrine in life after death, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.